MReport October 2021

TheMReport — News and strategies for the evolving mortgage marketplace.

Issue link:

Contents of this Issue


Page 48 of 67

M R EP O RT | 47 O R I G I NAT I O N S E R V I C I N G DATA G O V E R N M E N T S E C O N DA R Y M A R K E T THE LATEST ORIGINATION Housing Affordability a Huge Obstacle for Minimum Wage Workers A new study has found that the average difference between an affordable monthly housing payment and median gross rent is $533. A s enhanced federal unemployment benefits and eviction moratoria end, some workers are returning to work only to dis- cover that no matter how much they work, a minimum wage job cannot earn an affordable rent payment in any state. Minimum wage debates are not new, and have been going on since its inception in 1938 when the first federal minimum wage was set at $0.25 an hour. The current federal minimum wage is currently $7.25 an hour, and was set in 2009. However, 29 states and Washington, D.C., have higher minimum wage requirements. According to a new report authored by Jacob Channel, Senior Economic Analyst for LendingTree, owning a home is less affordable for full-time minimum wage workers than renting one. On average, an af- fordable payment for minimum wage workers is $1,074 less than the median monthly housing costs paid by a homeowner with a mortgage. "Though it's cheaper than own- ing a home—at least when you're still paying off a mortgage—rent- ing is unaffordable to minimum wage workers in every state," Channel said. "Across the nation, the average difference between an affordable monthly housing payment and median gross rent is $533." The best place for a minimum wage worker to own a home is Arkansas where the minimum wage is $11 an hour. Workers there could afford a $572 monthly payment—but the median home- owner pays $1,094 per month, leaving workers to come up with a difference of $522. The least affordable place for a minimum wage earner to own a home was found to be in Hawaii. With a minimum wage of $10.10 an hour, a worker could afford a monthly payment of $525. However, with a median payment of $2,472, workers would need to make an additional $1,947 per month. The situation does not get much better for renters on mini- mum wage. Arkansas again was the best state to rent for minimum wage workers. The median rent for the state is $742 meaning workers would have to come up with a difference of $170. "In terms of raw dollars, own- ing and renting have become less affordable since 2000," Channel said. "The average difference between an affordable monthly payment for a minimum wage worker and the median monthly homeowner costs for a home with a mortgage in 2000 was $771, while the difference between an affordable payment and the me- dian gross rent was $296. In 2010, those differences were $1,072 and $423, respectively." Channel said that raising the federal minimum wage will improve the situation, but owning a home or renting will still be too expensive for everyone. "To remedy part of the fi- nancial burden placed on those earning minimum wage, some— including President Joe Biden— have called for raising the federal minimum wage to $15 an hour," Channel said. "If this were to happen, then median-priced hous- ing would remain unaffordable for minimum wage workers across most of the country. For example, by increasing the minimum wage to $15 an hour, a full-time worker could afford to spend $780 a month on housing. In only five states—West Virginia, Arkansas, South Dakota, Kentucky, and Mississippi—would this be enough to comfortably afford the median monthly gross rent for the state." Data for the report was gleaned from the U.S. Department of Labor and the U.S. Census Bureau's 2019 American Community Survey. The report assumed workers completed a full 40-hour work week, 52 weeks a year. An affordable rent payment was targeted at 30% of a worker's gross pay.

Articles in this issue

Archives of this issue

view archives of TheMReport - MReport October 2021